Google Pics Puts Object-Level Photo Editing Inside Docs
Software / news
Google Pics Puts Object-Level Photo Editing Inside Docs
The Nano Banana-powered tool lets a Workspace user isolate one object in an image and edit it without touching the rest, but Google has not said when it reaches Drive.
Google Pics, a Workspace image tool that lets a user select a single object inside a picture and edit it without disturbing anything else in the frame, reached general availability on Sept. 1 for Business Standard and Business Plus, Enterprise Standard and Enterprise Plus customers, plus Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers, Google said in its own announcement.
The tool runs on Google's Nano Banana image model and adds object segmentation, letting a user isolate an element by clicking it and typing a change rather than regenerating the whole image, according to Google's launch post. It can also edit or translate text that already appears inside an image, preserving the original font and layout, and crop a single source image for web, social, print and other formats without a separate export step. Google Pics product manager Meg Whittenberger described the goal in the launch post as letting a user "generate, refine, and co-create images with unparalleled precision."
Where it lives, and where it does not yet
Users reach Google Pics three ways: as a standalone site at pics.new, or from directly inside Google Docs and Slides, where selecting an image surfaces the full editing toolset without switching tabs, 9to5Google reported. Drive integration, which would let a user apply the same object-level edits to images already stored there, is not part of the Sept. 1 release; Google said only that it is coming in the following weeks, without a specific date.
| Plan | Google Pics included? |
|---|---|
| Workspace Business Standard / Plus | Yes, from Sept. 1 |
| Workspace Enterprise Standard / Plus | Yes, from Sept. 1 |
| Google AI Pro / Ultra | Yes, from Sept. 1 |
| Google AI Pro for Education | Yes, from Sept. 1 |
A different license than Google's other September release
Google Pics carries no license restriction of the kind Google attached to TimesFM-3, the forecasting model it shipped the same week: that model blocks commercial use outright, while Google Pics is included in paid Workspace and Google AI plans specifically for business use. The two releases show Google applying very different rules to two products built on its own AI research within the same seven days, with no public explanation for the gap.
Other generative-media vendors have drawn their commercial lines differently. Lightricks gates free commercial use of its LTX-2.5 video model at $10 million in annual revenue, a threshold with a specific number attached; Google's approach for Google Pics is simpler by comparison, tying access to a Workspace or Google AI subscription tier rather than to how much revenue the user's company makes.
Google has not disclosed usage limits, whether generations count against an existing Gemini quota, how Google Pics handles images a user does not have the rights to edit, or whether a Workspace admin can turn the feature off separately from Gemini access generally. None of the coverage The Terminal reviewed, including Google's own post, addressed admin-level controls. Whether Drive integration ships on the timeline Google described, and whether Google answers the admin-control question before then, is what Workspace IT teams are watching for next.
Sources
More in Software
- 01ZCode Uploads Users' Full Git History, Zhipu Says It Deletes ItA developer's reverse-engineering forced a same-day apology from Zhipu over a coding assistant that never told users it was packaging their repositories for the cloud.
- 02Alibaba's Open Code Review Tool Ships an IntelliJ PluginVersion 1.12.6 extends the AI code reviewer to JetBrains IDEs the same week Alibaba's own benchmark shows it trading recall for precision against Claude Code.
- 03Flet Reaches 1.0, Ships One Python App to Six PlatformsFeodor Fitsner's framework rebuilt its bridge to Flutter for the stable release, but has not said how many people pay for anything built on top of it.
- 04Bend 2 Bets Formal Proof Can Catch AI's Coding MistakesVictor Taelin's rewritten language backs its safety pitch with a compiler its own README calls 99 percent AI-written and not yet audited.