CERT-In's 107-Page AI Audit Rules Set Four Risk Tiers
Security / explainer
CERT-In's 107-Page AI Audit Rules Set Four Risk Tiers
The Nov. 4 guidelines tie audit frequency and remediation deadlines to a system's tier, and RBI's separate API advisory carries its own Dec. 3 and Feb. 3 dates.

CERT-In, India's national computer emergency response team, published its 107-page Artificial Intelligence Security Auditing Guidelines on Nov. 4, 2026. They apply to AI systems that organisations in India develop, buy, deploy or operate, and to systems that process Indian data or serve Indian users, according to MediaNama and The420.in.
The guidelines are not a new statute. The420.in quotes them as saying the framework "does not, by itself, establish a new standalone AI law." What they do is give auditors, and the regulators who rely on them, a common checklist. The document is separate from the payment-API advisories we covered in CERT-In's naming of the CRAFTY FALCON actor, though both arrived in the same week.

How the four tiers work
A system is classed Low, Moderate, High or Critical on factors including impact severity, decision autonomy, data sensitivity, scale and exposure, reversibility and sector criticality. MediaNama's summary of the tiers:
| Tier | Description | Audit requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Advisory or assistive, limited autonomy | Streamlined requirements |
| Moderate | Influences business processes, defined human oversight | Annual independent audit by CERT-In-empanelled auditors |
| High | Significant effects on operations, users or sensitive data | Periodic independent audits, possibly every six months |
| Critical | Severe or systemic risk, including critical infrastructure | Empanelled audits and continuous monitoring |
Tiers can be raised if a system's use, impact or exposure changes. The420.in adds that systems must be reassessed when capabilities or operating environment change.
Remediation clocks by finding severity
Auditors rate findings Critical, High, Moderate or Low. MediaNama reports these deadlines:
| Finding | Remediation | Corrective action plan | Progress reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical and High | Not specified | Required | Monthly |
| Moderate | Plan within 30 business days, implement within 60 days | Required | Quarterly |
| Low | Within three months | Not specified | Annually |
A re-audit is required when an audit opinion is unsatisfactory or when two or more Critical findings arise within three months. A regulator can demand one sooner.
Extra scrutiny for agents, RAG and generative models
For generative AI the guidelines name prompt injection, sensitive-information disclosure, data and model poisoning, hallucinations and improper output handling. Retrieval-augmented generation systems get a review of retrieval pipelines, vector databases and embeddings. Agentic systems are examined for tool use, excessive agency, least-privilege access and persistent memory. Deepfakes require explicit consent in relevant contexts, with measures such as C2PA content provenance.
Auditors may use AI tools for evidence analysis and report drafting, but only with approved scope, confidentiality controls and human review. The guidelines say, as MediaNama and The420.in each quote them with slightly different wording, that AI-generated findings cannot replace sufficient evidence or independent human judgement. That sentence applies equally to tools that audit coding-agent sessions.
What is old and what is new
Incident reporting is the figure most likely to be misread. Reportable AI security incidents must be notified to CERT-In within six hours and logs kept for 180 days. The420.in says this is not a new obligation: it comes from CERT-In's directions of April 28, 2022, which the guidelines fold into the AI framework. An inaccurate chatbot answer does not by itself count as a reportable incident.
RBI's separate deadlines for bank APIs
MediaNama reported on Nov. 6, drawing on an exclusive by Arti Singh of The Head and Tale, that the Reserve Bank of India met bankers for nearly two hours and sent a confidential advisory dated Nov. 3. As reported, banks must hold at least one safeguard on API fund transfers, with existing integrations compliant by Dec. 3, 2026 and new ones before going live. NBFC API clients must complete CERT-In audits by Feb. 3, 2027, and audits must be repeated yearly. Per-transaction and daily limits take effect immediately, and intra-day velocity limits within one month. The advisory text itself was not available for this report, so these dates rest on MediaNama's account.
The next date to watch is Dec. 3, 2026, when the first RBI API deadline falls.
Sources
More in Security
- 01Apple's CVE-2024-27834, Patched in May 2024, Reaches CISA's KEV on Sekoia's Report of an APT29-Linked Web CampaignA 5.5-rated pointer authentication bypass is the second stage of an iOS 16.7 cookie-stealing chain. Sekoia's report also names a Plerdy SEO Tracker compromise and an Android chain.
- 02Plex2Shell Reached CISA's KEV 78 Days After Plex Shipped the FixFour Plex Media Server flaws chain into unauthenticated code execution on any server older than 1.43.3.10861, and attackers were installing miners within a day of a public proof of concept.
- 03CISA's BOD 26-04 Deadlines: 120 of 152 KEV Entries Since June Carry a Three-Day DeadlineThe directive that replaced BOD 22-01 on June 10 sets deadlines by exposure and exploit risk, and the catalog shows the short window is now the norm.
- 04VMware ESX Flaw Rated 2.7 Was a Zero-Day for Warp PandaCVE-2026-41709 lets an administrator skip the audit log, CrowdStrike says a China-nexus group used it in early 2026, and ESXi 7.0 has no listed fix.